 |
Important News and Information
NUCATS Pilot Grant Applications Due December 5th
***If you are interested in applying, please contact the Office of Sponsored Programs***
Dear Colleague,
The Northwestern University Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute (NUCATS) is dedicated to the growth and support of clinical and translational research across the Northwestern enterprise. To this end, and following our recent NIH CTSA award, the Center for Translational Innovation at NUCATS is pleased to announce our Fall 2008 Pilot Grant Competition (http://www.nucats.northwestern.edu/pilots/index.html).
What are we looking for? We’re looking for those high-risk/high-reward ideas that have been waiting for some proof of concept funds. For example:
Are you a clinician who thinks you’ve got the vision for a new medical device that could revolutionize your field?
- Are you a basic science researcher who sees a clear clinical application for your work?
- Are you an engineer working with unique materials that could have clinical implications?
- Are you an investigator trying to get some data for a new drug candidate?
Then you’re exactly who we want to hear from.
In fact, we’re so interested in hearing from you that we’ll even try to play matchmaker. If you need help finding a collaborator or identifying a resource, we’ll try to help out. Just give us plenty of heads up and we’ll do our best.
The common theme of this competition is that all proposals should address significant unmet needs that have direct bearing on clinical problems. Pilot awards will provide seed funding exclusively for novel, high-risk ideas and ideally foster new interdisciplinary and cross-NU collaborations. We expect these awards will provide data to support subsequent proposals to external funding sources. With rare exceptions (drug discovery/development being one) we’re looking for brand new projects that have received no other funding.
Who can apply? All full-time faculty at Northwestern University, and full time investigators based at Children’s Memorial and the Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago are eligible to apply. Young investigators and proposals with co-investigators are especially encouraged, as are proposals from multiple institutions or schools, and those with new collaborators. Limit one project per PI per submission cycle.
What is the funding level? Awards will be one time and for a maximum of $50,000, but you can submit for less—really, you can. The total number of grants awarded depends on the number, cost, and quality of applications, but we anticipate funding a minimum of five awards annually over two funding cycles.
How do I apply? You can find forms and full instructions at http://www.nucats.northwestern.edu/pilots/index.html
When is the application deadline? 5 p.m., December 5, 2008
When will awardees be notified? On or around January 13, 2009
When will funding start? As early as February 1, 2009, but not until NUCATS staff are satisfied that all required administrative and regulatory approvals are in place.
What if I need more information or need help finding a collaborator? Check out the NUCATS site above or write Dave Johnson (davej@northwestern.edu) or Jim Bray (j-bray@northwestern.edu) at NUCATS.
Good luck!
Philip Greenland, MD, Director, NUCATS
John Linehan, PhD, Director, Center for Translational Innovation
The December 3 Deadline for NIH Loan Repayment Applications is approaching! Please ensure that your top researchers are submitting their applications.
Dear Colleague:
As someone who has provided institutional certification for applicants to the program, you likely know firsthand the positive impact these awards can have on the careers of biomedical and behavioral researchers. Current participants tell us that it most often was word-of-mouth and direct encouragement from a mentor, supervisor, or other colleague that led them to apply to the LRPs. Often, their LRP award was what allowed them to pursue and thrive in a research career.
Please share this e-mail with top researchers in your organization who may benefit from this career-enhancing opportunity. The December 3 deadline will approach quickly.
BENEFITS: New extramural LRP contracts for Clinical Research, Pediatric Research, Health Disparities Research, Contraception and Infertility Research, and Clinical Research for Individuals from Disadvantaged Backgrounds are awarded for two-year periods and repay up to $35,000 of qualified educational debt annually. An NIH grant or other NIH funding is not required to apply for or participate in the LRPs.
ELIGIBILITY: Applicants must possess a doctoral-level degree (except for the Contraception and Infertility Research LRP); be a U.S. citizen, national, or permanent resident; devote 20 hours or more per week to conducting qualified research funded by a university, domestic nonprofit organization, or federal, state, or local government entity; and have qualified educational loan debt equal to or exceeding 20 percent of their institutional base salary.
QUESTIONS? Visit the LRP website at http://www.lrp.nih.gov for more information and to access the online application. For additional assistance, call or e-mail the LRP Information Center at (866) 849-4047 or lrp@nih.gov.
Sincerely,
NIH Division of Loan Repayment
lrp@nih.gov
New NIH Policy on Resubmission (Amended) Applications
Purpose
NIH announces a change in the existing policy on resubmission (amended) applications (see http://grants.nih.gov/grants/policy/amendedapps.htm). Beginning with original new applications (i.e., never submitted) and competing renewal applications submitted for the January 25, 2009 due dates and beyond, the NIH will accept only a single amendment to the original application. Failure to receive funding after two submissions (i.e., the original and the single amendment) will mean that the applicant should substantially re-design the project rather than simply change the application in response to previous reviews. It is expected that this policy will lead to funding high quality applications earlier, with fewer resubmissions.
Background
Following the release of the Peer Review Report that was drafted with extensive consultation with the external community, Dr. Zerhouni, NIH Director, established a Peer Review Oversight Committee (PROC) to finalize the recommendations and begin immediate implementation of those recommendations. Of particular concern was the marked reduction in the number of awards made in response to original applications. An increasing number of projects were funded only after one or more resubmissions. In periods of constricted funding, a greater number of projects require resubmission, and review committees are more likely to show greater preference for amended applications. These trends have increased the time from original submission to award and the number of submissions per investigator. As a result, there has been greater burden placed on applicants and reviewers as well as a delay in funding for meritorious science.
To change this trend and increase the likelihood that meritorious original applications will be funded, the NIH will decrease the number of amendments allowed. Accordingly, the NIH will begin to phase out second amendment applications starting with the January 25, 2009 due date. This policy will increase the numbers of high quality original and first amendments that can be funded earlier.
NIH Policy on Resubmission (Amended) Applications
Beginning with applications intended for the January 25, 2009 due date, all original new applications (i.e., never submitted) and competing renewal applications will be permitted only a single amendment (A1). For this and subsequent cohorts of original new and competing renewal applications, any second amendment (A2) will be administratively withdrawn and not accepted for review. Applicants who fail to receive funding after two submissions may resubmit but only if the application is fundamentally revised to qualify as new. A new application is expected to be substantially different in content and scope with more significant differences than are normally encountered in an amended application. Note that there is no time limit for the submission of the original and subsequent A1.
Original new and competing renewal applications that were submitted prior to January 25, 2009 will be permitted two amendments (A1 and A2). For these “grandfathered” applications, NIH expects that any A2 will be submitted no later than January 7, 2011, and NIH will not accept A2 applications after that date.
This policy applies to all applications, including applications submitted under the NIH Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) and Small Business Technology Transfer (STTR) programs, Career Development Awards, Individual Fellowships, Institutional Training Grants, Resource Grants, Program Projects, and Centers. Currently no amendments are permitted for applications received in response to a Request for Applications (RFA) unless it is specified in the Funding Opportunity Announcement, in which case only one amendment will be permitted.
Inquiries
Applicants are strongly encouraged to discuss their questions with their NIH IC contact. For additional information or questions, please contact:
Division of Receipt and Referral Center for Scientific Review 6701 Rockledge Drive MSC 7720 Bethesda, MD 20892-7720 Voice: (301) 435-0715 Fax: (301) 480-1987
Or send an email to EnhancingPeerReview@mail.nih.gov.
NIH Modifies New Investigator Policy to Identify Early Stage Investigators
Purpose
This notice describes a change in NIH New Investigator policies designed to encourage early transition to independence. Under this policy, New Investigators within ten years of completing their terminal research degree or within ten years of completing their medical residency will be designated Early Stage Investigators (ESIs). Traditional NIH research grant (R01s) applications from ESIs will be identified and the career stage of the applicant will be considered at the time of review and award.
Background
For more than three decades the NIH has explicitly encouraged New Investigators to apply for NIH research grant support. The involvement of New Investigators is considered essential to the vitality of health-related research and has been addressed by several important NIH programs and studies which are detailed on the New Investigator Website at http://grants.nih.gov/grants/new_investigators/resources.htm.
In spite of persistent attention to the identification and funding of New Investigators, the duration of postdoctoral training has increased. This is consistent with the observation that the average age at which an investigator first obtains R01 funding has increased by more than 5 years between 1980 to and 2001 (see http://grants.nih.gov/grants/new_investigators/Workforce_Info09072007.ppt). Current New Investigator policies have encouraged entry into the PI pool of investigators but those policies have not addressed the problem of elongated periods of training or the delayed transition to independence.
Accordingly, the NIH will more broadly adopt an approach piloted by the NIH Director’s New Innovator Award (DP2) (http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/rfa-files/RFA-RM-08-014.html). This award is targeted to applicants within 10 years of completing their terminal degree or within 10 years of completing their medical residency. Other features of the New Innovator Award may not apply to ESIs.
The NIH will continue to encourage all New Investigators to apply for NIH R01 awards. However, under this new policy, those New Investigators who are within 10 years of their terminal research degree or within 10 years of completing a medical residency, will be identified as Early Stage Investigators. Their applications will be identified and their career stage will be considered at the time of review and award. It is hoped that by providing an advantage for ESIs, the NIH will be able to directly encourage earlier application for NIH research grant support. Definitions
New Investigator: An NIH research grant Program Director/Principal Investigator (PD/PI) who has not yet competed successfully for a substantial, competing NIH research grant is considered a New Investigator. For example, a PD/PI who has previously received a competing NIH R01 research grant is no longer considered a New Investigator. However, a PD/PI who has received a Small Grant (R03) or an Exploratory/Developmental Research Grant Award (R21) retains his or her status as a New Investigator. A complete definition of a New Investigator along with a list of NIH grants that do not disqualify a PD/PI from being considered a New Investigator can be found at http://grants1.nih.gov/grants/new_investigators/resources.htm. Early Stage Investigator (ESI): An individual who is classified as a New or First-Time Investigator and is within 10 years of completing his/her terminal research degree or is within 10 years of completing medical residency (or the equivalent) is considered an Early Stage Investigator (ESI).
Extension of ESI Eligibility: The 10 year period after completion of the terminal degree or residency may be extended to accommodate special circumstances including various medical concerns, disability, pressing family care responsibilities, or active duty military service. Guidelines for requesting and considering such requests are being developed and will be announced.
Planned Implementation
Beginning with traditional R01 applications received for the February 2009 receipt dates, the NIH will identify applications from ESIs and New Investigators and the career stage of the PD/PI will be considered at the time of review and award. Some of the details are still being worked out and will be announced as they become available. At the current time it is expected that the implementation will include the following features:
- The NIH will modify the data collection related to degree dates and medical residency within the personal profile of the eRA Commons (https://commons.era.nih.gov/commons/). When the revised data collection approach is announced PD/PIs must update their personal profile in the eRA Commons to provide information on degree and residency completion dates in order to be considered for the ESI classification.
- New Investigators within 10 years of their terminal research degree or within 10 years of completing their medical residency will be identified as ESIs using data entered in the eRA Commons.
- Investigators who enter degree and residency completion dates will be notified of their ESI status by email.
- A procedure and guidelines for requesting an extension of the period of ESI eligibility will be developed and announced to accommodate individuals with various medical concerns, disability, pressing family care responsibilities, or active duty military service. Once the procedure has been announced, applicants will be able to request an extension of the indicated 10 year period by providing an adequate justification.
- PD/PIs who receive a substantive, competing NIH research grant will lose their New Investigator status and hence their status as an ESI.
- NIH will eliminate the New Investigator Check Box on the face page of PHS 398 and Form 424 R&R application. New Investigators will be identified using data within the NIH administrative database.
- Applications from ESIs and New Investigators will be identified to reviewers so that appropriate consideration of their career stage can be applied during review.
- As in the past, an application with more than one Principal Investigator will be identified for consideration by reviewers if all of the listed Principal Investigators qualify as ESIs or New Investigators.
- Staff in the NIH institutes and centers will be apprised of ESI and New Investigator status and this factor will be considered when applications are selected for award.
More complete information on the ESI-related features of the eRA Commons; instructions to reviewers for consideration of ESI applications; grouping of applications from ESIs during peer review; the process and criteria for requesting an extension of the period of eligibility; and a series of Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) will be developed between the issuance of this announcement and the February R01 receipt dates.
Inquiries
Direct inquiries regarding this Notice to:
Walter T. Schaffer, Ph.D. Senior Scientific Advisor for Extramural Research Office of Extramural Research Building One, Room 138 Bethesda, MD 20892 Tel: (301) 402-2725 E-mail: schaffew@od.nih.gov
NIH Announces Transition Schedule to Adobe Acrobat Forms
Purpose: This Notice provides the Transition Schedule for NIH/AHRQ/CDC/NIOSH/FDA from PureEdge to Adobe-based grant application forms for electronic submissions of SF424 Research and Related (R&R) applications. Please note the importance of this schedule, as Grants.gov will not accept PureEdge applications after the transition dates noted below.
Most electronic submissions to NIH on or after January 1, 2009, must use Adobe application forms, except:
- Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR [R41/ R44])/Small Business Technology Transfer (STTR [R41/R42] and Conference (R13/U13) grant applications for the January 7, 2009, AIDS submission deadlines.
- Funding Opportunity Announcements (FOAs) with non-standard submission dates expiring on or before January 31, 2009, can use PureEdge until the expiration date (except RFA-AI-08-053 and RFA-RM-08-029, which use Adobe).
NIH Transition Schedule to Adobe for Standard Submission Dates
The following table provides the final standard submission dates for PureEdge applications, along with the first Adobe submission dates.
|
Grant type
|
FINAL PureEdge Submission Date
|
First Adobe Submission Date
|
|
C06/UC6, R18/U18, R25, Gs, S11, S21, S22, SC1, SC2, SC3
|
9/25/2008
|
1/7/2009 (AIDS)
|
|
R15
|
10/25/2008
|
1/7/2009 (AIDS)
|
|
R01
|
11/5/2008
|
1/7/2009 (AIDS)
|
|
R03, R21, R33, R21/R33, R34, R36
|
11/16/2008
|
1/7/2009 (AIDS)
|
|
R13/U13
|
1/7/2009 (AIDS)
|
4/12/2009
|
|
R41, R42, R43, R44
|
1/7/2009 (AIDS)
|
4/5/2009
|
- The overall electronic submission process of finding opportunities, downloading application packages, preparing forms, preparing attachments, and submitting applications remains the same.
- Although the new Adobe forms have a slightly different look and feel from the PureEdge forms, the changes are mainly cosmetic.
IMPORTANT NOTES
- It is crucial that applicants check the FOA in December to download the new Adobe application forms: Between now and December, NIH will publish new FOAs without accompanying application forms. We expect to have the forms for posting from Grants.gov by early December 2008; NIH will issue a Guide Notice when the Adobe forms are available. Adobe forms for small business applications and conference applications will be posted in early February 2009.
- NIH currently has FOAs that are active for three years; these are also transitioning to Adobe. Adobe forms will replace PureEdge forms in the December 2008 timeframe. PureEdge forms will not be accepted by the Grants.gov system after the transition to Adobe.
- Grants.gov requires a specific version of Adobe Reader in order to open, download save and submit an Adobe application. The latest versions are listed on the Grants.gov site and are updated as new editions are produced (see the Download Software page).
- CAUTION: Applicants should make sure they are using the recommended versions of Adobe Reader. Versions earlier than 8.1.2 should not be used and may corrupt when the completed application is uploaded.
PLEASE BE ADVISED
- Applicants currently working on a PureEdge grant application to be submitted in January 2009, are advised to continue to develop their research plan components and other parts of the application that will be uploaded as attachments, but wait to complete the application forms until the Adobe forms become available in December (unless it is exempted as noted above).
More details will be provided in the coming weeks on the Resources for Adobe Transition Web page on the Electronic Submission of Grant Applications Web site at: http://era.nih.gov/ElectronicReceipt/.
Support During the transition to Adobe forms, applicants should follow the usual process for seeking support with any electronic submission issue. Questions on form functionality or submission of the forms to Grants.gov should be directed to the Grants.gov Contact Center. If you encounter a technical issue that threatens NIH’s timely receipt of your application, work with the Grants.gov Contact Center and be sure to contact the eRA Help Desk at NIH to document the issue and provide us with the Grants.gov Contact Center tracking number.
Related Guide Notices: Adobe Pilot Application Guide Available (August 1, 2008) Pilot for Transition from PureEdge to Adobe-based forms (July 2, 2008) NIH/AHRQ Set Transition to Adobe for Dec. 2008 (May 23, 2008)
Inquiries
Questions about this Notice should be directed to:
Grants Information Office of Extramural Research National Institutes of Health Phone: 301-435-0714 TTY: 301-451-0088 Email: grantsinfo@nih.gov
Enhancing Peer Review Activity at NIH
The NIH Peer Review Oversight Committee and three subgroups consisting of NIH program, review, grants management and evaluation staff have developed an initial implementation timeline for the Enhancing Peer Review activity. The recommendations that are being implemented are based on the result of the diagnostic phase and significant dialogue with both the internal and external communities regarding enhancements to the review system (please see http://enhancing-peer-review.nih.gov for an overview of the Enhancing Peer Review effort). I view these enhancements as progress towards ensuring the continuation of NIH’s world renowned peer review system.
Although the subgroups are continuing to work out specific details of the implementation plans, I want to share with you the first of the preliminary implementation plans for the 2009 through 2010 calendar years as follows:
Priority Area 1 – Engage the Best Reviewers
- Improve Reviewer Retention: In 2009, new reviewers will be given additional flexibility regarding their tour of duty, and other efforts will be undertaken to improve retention of standing review members.
- Recruit the Best Reviewers: A toolkit, incorporating best practices for recruiting reviewers, will be made available to all ICs in 2009.
- Enhance Reviewer Training: In spring 2009, training will be available to reviewers and SROs related to the changes in peer review.
- Allow Flexibility through Virtual Reviews: Pilots will be conducted in 2009 on the feasibility of using high-bandwidth support for review meetings to provide reviewers greater flexibility and alternatives for in-person meetings.
Priority Area 2 – Improve the Quality and Transparency of Review
- Improve Scoring Transparency and Scale: Review criteria-based scoring on 1 to 7 scale commences in May 2009. Reviewers will provide feedback through scores and critiques for each criterion in a structured summary statement.
- Provide Scores for Streamlined Applications: In 2009, streamlined applications will receive a preliminary score.
- Shorten and Restructure Applications: Shorter (12-page research plan) R01 applications (with other activity codes scaled appropriately) will be restructured to align with review criteria for January 2010 receipt dates.
Priority Area 3 – Ensure Balanced and Fair Reviews across Scientific Fields and Career Stages, and Reduce Administrative Burden
- Fund the Best Science Earlier and Reduce Need for Resubmissions: To ensure that the largest number of high quality and meritorious applications receive funding earlier and to improve system efficiency, NIH is considering separate percentiling of new and resubmitted applications and permitting one amended application.
- Review Like Applications Together: NIH is establishing an Early Stage Investigator (ESI) designation. In 2009, NIH will evaluate clustering ESI applications for review. The same approach will be considered for clinical research applications.
Thank You The enhancing peer review activity has been an intensive year-long effort. Many of you have contributed valuable feedback and input and I’d like to take this opportunity to convey my appreciation and specially thank you for your input.
Updates and details will be posted at http://enhancing-peer-review.nih.gov and published in the monthly Extramural Nexus (subscribe at https://list.nih.gov/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=extramuralnexus&A=1) as they are known. Also, several notices will be posted in the NIH Guide detailing specific elements of this implementation.
|
 |